Comparative evaluation of debris extrusion by three file systems with different cross-sectional design- An in-vitro study

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: May 3, 2023

Main Article Content

Dr. Neetish Shriram Chavhan
Senior Lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Aditya Dental College, Beed, Maharashtra, India.(Corresponding author)
Dr. K. Sandya Rani
Assistant Professor, Department of Dental Surgery, AMC, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Dr. Sheetal Grover
Reader, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Seema Dental College and Hospital, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Dr. Manjari Chaudhary
Lecturer, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, MGM Dental College, Hospital, Kamothe, Navi Mumbai, India.
Dr.Gaurav Agrawal
Senior Lecturer, Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, RDC PIMS, Loni, Ghaziabad, India.
Dr. Dipooja Patil
Assistant Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, India.

Abstract

Background: To compare and evaluate debris extrusion by three file systems. Materials & methods: A 30 mandibular first premolars were randomly assigned to 3 groups (n = 10 teeth/group). The root canals were instrumented according to the manufacturers’ instructions using the The debris extrusion was compared and statistically analyzed using analysis of variance and SPSS software. Results: The mean apically extruded weight of debris in WaveOne (0.0078 g) was more when compared with the Hyflex (0.0018 g). Conclusion: The WaveOne™ and ProTaper™ rotary instruments produced significantly more debris compared with Hyflex CM™ rotary instruments (P < 0.05).

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 56 No. 2 (2023): Pakistan Heart Journal
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.